Things to Remember When Reviewing and Refereeing Papers
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Thanks to the roughly two dozen people who responded to the ISWORLD listserv in February and March 2001 with citations and advice on giving good reviews. I also received a number of interesting messages with examples of "what makes a bad review." I found the collective input and discussion both interesting and educational (and hope others did too). I have loosely compiled the responses into two parts. This message contains a list of references/citations provided. The next one will contain excerpts from several of the messages received or posted to the list. (Mark Nelson).
منابع مشابه
Incentivizing anonymous “peer-to-peer” reviews
The review cycle for papers takes way too long in many disciplines. The problem is that while authors want to have their own papers reviewed fast, that are often unwilling to review the papers of others in a timely manner. This paper explores what would be required to incentivize fast reviews using a public reputation/scoring system that exploits the fact that the referees are drawn from the sa...
متن کاملReviewing health manpower development. A method of improving national health systems.
Excellent book is always being the best friend for spending little time in your office, night time, bus, and everywhere. It will be a good way to just look, open, and read the book while in that time. As known, experience and skill don't always come with the much money to acquire them. Reading this book with the PDF reviewing health manpower development a method of improving national health sys...
متن کاملاندازه گیری عملکرد بیمارستان
Introduction: The core requirement of successful and innovative organizations is doing right things and doing things right. Nowadays organizations are to perform excellently strategically and operationally so that they can face the current and future world challenges. Performance measurement is one of the ways in directing organization to the right targets and avoid diversity in practices. The ...
متن کاملThree Views of Peer Review, Volume 50, Number 6
One of the gratifying things about being a mathematician is that one exercises a considerable amount of control over the world we live in. The typical mathematician has a lot to say about the curriculum in the mathematics department, about which students are admitted to the program, and particularly about what goes on in the classroom. Even better, most of us have a considerable slice of time t...
متن کاملWhat can new technology tell us about the reviewing process for journal submissions in BJET?
New technology allows us to collect rich and voluminous data about refereeing — something that was not possible before. In this quantitative study we consider data about the dates of sending (i) suitable articles to BJET, (ii) the articles to referees, and (iii) when the referees’ reports are returned to the editor. To do this we examined data from over 11,000 reports collected between 2005 (wh...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002